The thoughts of a bald SEO guy

WordTracker Interview and Resulting Article

I was floored this morning when I discovered just how huge the WordTracker interview has become. I woke up to several emails, direct messages, Facebook messages, and even a post to my Facebook wall of the link to the story.

I feel very fortunate to work at a company like Tribune at this time. Most would think I’m crazy to stay at a bankrupt company in an industry that has serious concerns of its survival. But what those people wouldn’t know is the culture of change that Tribune has instilled into every aspect of the organization. It’s that spirit of change and dedication to truly wanting (and admittedly, needing) to make a change that is so compelling for me. So despite the crap that’s being written about Tribune lately, the management team is doing a fine job getting the mindset shift completed in order to obtain survival.

Despite the WordTracker article’s title, this is clearly not something ‘I’ did but ‘we’ did (but I love the keyword loaded title, so I’d stick with it). I truly have an amazing team over here at Tribune. Sure, none of them necessarily report to me, but they are still part of the SEO team. From the technology experts, to the newsrooms, to the broadcast anchors . . . all a fantastic group. It’s damn cool when you can say that your personal life and business life fully overlap because the people you work with are also the same people you want to have as your closest and dearest friends. Some of which seem to become family.

Furthermore, the Search industry is one that I have the utmost respect for. It’s pretty amazing when you can be a part of an industry where you can meet with people a few times a year and yet still truly consider them to be friends. The level of support, in not only business, but personal situations as well is unmatched in any other industry I’ve seen or heard of. When I tell people about how forgiving, open, understanding, and fun the Search industry is, I see the envy on their faces and their lust to be a part of it as well.

It’s this passion for a company that wants to change coupled with an industry that I’ve grown to love as a whole and as individuals that keeps me focused on the goal of finding success however I can. Sure, sometimes it takes pulling the pin of a grenade and launching it into a room full of team members to get it done, but that’s normal–and part of the fun. So far, we managed to fix the problem before the grenade explodes and we all have a few laughs about it later (often at a bar, Cub’s game, or even with a shot of alcohol at someone’s cubicle). Even in the industry we toss grenades at one another and it causes some issues but we usually get over them quickly and never have an issue sitting down with someone at a bar for a drink or two.

For those of you that know me, you know that I’m not the corporate type. I’m not the guy that obsesses over the latest ways to use voice inflection in a speech to capture an audience or reads the latest book from some Search icon to be in the know. I’m just me. That guy that has a blast at conferences, uses Twitter way too damn much, shoots the shit with Googlers more than trying to pick their brains on the latest algo tweak, and forgets at times that his own choice of being ultra open isn’t necessarily for everyone (i.e. the thousands of pics I have of industry folks on Flickr, and the videos of some I posted for a short time).

So, though the write up on WordTracker about how “Brent D Payne increased Tribune sites’ monthly visits by a cool 20 million” may highlight some of the things I did, it’s about the team of people both inside and outside of Tribune that choose to listen to me, support me, and teach me that make it possible. None of them have to make that choice–but yet they do and I thank them/you for that.

I’m very impressed with Rachelle’s ability to find such nice things to say about me. I think it’s a testimony of what a quality journalist can do. If she can make me look professional . . . damn she must be good! ;-)

Enjoy the article and realize that Payne does have something in that head of his other than smart ass comments, wacky tweets, and a sponge for alcohol. LOL

P.S. Love the ‘bald SEO‘ anchor . . . nice touch!

Now I have some more work to do . . .

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

6 Comments to WordTracker Interview and Resulting Article

  1. 08/27/2009 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Hiya Brent. Just like at the Trib, we have a team at Wordtracker too and it took all of us to make you look like a pro ;)

    Glad you like the on-page SEO. This’ll kill you. From where I’m typing, wortracker.com is beating brentdavidpayne.com for ‘tribune company seo’. Not that any one is searching for it, of course.

    But there must be thousands a day searching for ‘brent d payne’ keywords, right? And we’re catching you up for that already.

  2. 08/27/2009 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    More linking fun: Earlier today I couldn’t find you in the top 300 for ‘bald seo’ and now I’m seeing you at 24th. Perhaps a little on-page will take you to page one.

  3. 08/31/2009 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    Brent – really nice results – much respect, and thank you for the article…

    Instead of the Nike example used on the article – if you could please elaborate on steps 3 & 7, and how you used Wordtracker to help you specifically identify the words used, and why you selected the targeted keywords you did – a big help to many…

    The challenge with breaking news and Wordtracker’s backward looking (historical) database may force a leap of faith. Did you have hard data, leap, or possibly did you use other tools to help? (No offense intended to Wordtracker please…)

    I love Wordtracker, long time user, fan and prophet for the tool. This is not intended as a negative post, just trying to solve an information gap for our colleagues you may have cracked.

    “Michale Jackson dead” may seem like a no-brainer to some folks, but you chose that primary phrase for a specific combination of reasons I believe. Was is simply that it had the highest search counts with that day’s snapshot of the Wordtracker database? I think it will help a lot fellow compatriots if you can explain the “what”, “why” AND the “how” too.

    Thank you for your time.

    Regards,

    Tom Lynch

  4. 08/31/2009 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the speedy reply – yah makes a lot of sense… Though scary, we (as in searchers or “real” people) prefer the tools to be smart so we don’t have to be. It has got to be part of the scary algorithm – right? Google’s trends influences SERPs and CTRs, and emerging links confirm or or deny relevance. Broad searches will percolate hot news items. The playing field is skewed to the big player with lots of content and link juice unless you can get an exclusive, I guess… And even then once the mega-pubs get coverage the little guy loses out.

    Thanks again for your reply.

    Regards

    Tom Lynch

  5. 09/01/2009 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    Brent…the interview was inspiring! The link strategy for the Michael Jackson stuff was brilliant, I wonder how much traffic alone you siphoned to that.

    Can’t wait to see what’s next mate!

    Cheers,
    Ryan